Summary
- Tesla recalling almost 700,000 vehicles due to tire pressure monitoring system issue is actually just a software update
- Recalls regarding EVs are often misunderstood, with some requiring a visit to the dealer while others are just software updates
- A recall on 2025 Chevrolet Equinox EV for being too quiet requires a visit to the dealer for a software update
- The mix-up between real recalls and software updates can create confusion among EV owners and the general public
- It would be beneficial to differentiate between true recalls and software updates that don’t require the car owner’s attention
Article
The trend of scaremongering headlines about massive recalls for electric vehicles (EVs) continues, with recent examples including Tesla recalling 700,000 vehicles for a software update related to a tire pressure monitoring system issue. In reality, these software updates do not require EV owners to take any action, as they can typically be rolled out over-the-air without the need to visit a dealership. Despite this, headlines continue to perpetuate the notion of large-scale recalls that may not accurately reflect the situation. This can lead to misconceptions about the reliability of EVs and create unnecessary concern among non-EV owners.
A recent recall involving the 2025 Chevrolet Equinox EV highlights the complexities of software updates that cannot be done over-the-air. In this case, the issue was related to the fake noise EVs are required to make to ensure pedestrian safety at low speeds. While the fix is a software update, GM cannot implement it remotely, requiring owners of 7,606 affected vehicles to visit a dealership for the update to be installed. Despite being a straightforward software issue, the fact that it necessitates a visit to a dealer blurs the line between true recalls and software updates that do not impact the owner directly.
The confusion caused by mixing up real recalls with software updates can be detrimental to the perception of EVs among the general public. Headlines that suggest large-scale recalls create a false narrative that EVs are not reliable or ready for mainstream adoption. It is important for the automotive industry and media outlets to clarify the distinction between recalls that require physical service and software updates that can be performed remotely. By accurately representing these issues, the reputation of EVs can be preserved and misinformation can be minimized.
An over-the-air software update that does not require any action or attention from the EV owner should not be classified as a recall, as this term implies a more serious issue that necessitates physical attention at a dealership. With the growing prevalence of EVs and the reliance on software updates for maintenance and improvements, it is essential to differentiate between these two types of updates to avoid unnecessary confusion and concern among consumers. By using more descriptive terms for software updates, such as “over-the-air update,” the automotive industry can provide clarity and transparency to EV owners and the general public.
As the cleantech revolution continues to accelerate, it is crucial to support independent coverage of clean technologies through platforms like CleanTechnica. By contributing financially to independent media outlets that focus on clean energy and sustainability, individuals can help drive positive change and promote the adoption of renewable technologies. Additionally, staying informed about the latest developments in cleantech through newsletters and podcasts can empower individuals to make informed decisions about their energy consumption and contribute to a more sustainable future. By engaging with cleantech media, individuals can play a role in advancing the transition to cleaner and more efficient technologies.
Read the full article here
