Summary
- Hydrogen’s role in aviation dates back to the mid-20th century with various successful test flights
- Interest in hydrogen aviation waned after the Cold War but reignited in the 2000s due to climate change concerns
- Challenges with hydrogen aviation include low energy density, cryogenic storage, infrastructure, and safety
- Major players like Airbus have scaled back hydrogen efforts in favor of sustainable aviation fuels and operational efficiencies
- Prediction of a bloodbath in the hydrogen aviation sector with most startups going bankrupt and major players dropping out
Article
Hydrogen has been explored as a potential alternative to conventional jet fuel in aviation since the mid-20th century. While interest in hydrogen aviation waned after the Cold War, concerns over climate change and carbon emissions reignited research in the 2000s. Boeing made headlines in 2008 with the first successful flight of a small aircraft powered by a hydrogen fuel cell, and European aerospace leaders began seriously exploring hydrogen as a long-term solution in the 2010s. Startups like ZeroAvia and Universal Hydrogen also entered the space, aiming to develop retrofits for regional aircraft.
Despite initial interest, hydrogen faces challenges in aviation. One major obstacle is its low energy density by volume, requiring larger and heavier tanks compared to conventional jet fuel. Cryogenic storage of liquid hydrogen at -253°C adds weight and complexity to aircraft design. The lack of infrastructure at airports further complicates hydrogen’s viability, as transitioning to hydrogen would require massive investments in production, storage, and refueling systems. Safety concerns due to hydrogen’s flammability also pose challenges.
Multiple factors contribute to the conclusion that hydrogen may not play a significant role in aviation. The high cost of developing new aircraft designs, overhauling airport infrastructure, and ensuring safety compliance make hydrogen less competitive compared to alternatives like sustainable aviation fuels and battery-electric aircraft. Projection of aviation demand and repowering through 2100 suggests that battery-electric, hybrid electric, and SAF biofuels will likely provide the energy required for aviation, with hydrogen facing challenges in practicality and economics.
A compilation of firms in the hydrogen aviation segment predicts a potential “bloodbath” in the industry, with many startups facing financial challenges and potential closures. Major aviation manufacturers like Airbus have suspended efforts in hydrogen, realizing the limitations through straightforward analysis. The European aviation industry roadmap for net-zero emissions by 2050 has also revised down projections for hydrogen-powered aircraft contributions, leaning more heavily on SAFs, operational efficiencies, and market-based measures for decarbonization strategies.
As Airbus withdraws from the hydrogen aviation game and other major players limit their efforts, the focus shifts towards more promising decarbonization efforts like battery-electric hybrids and SAF biofuels. The likelihood of the 6% emissions reduction target from hydrogen aircraft dropping to 0% in the coming years is high, with startups facing bankruptcy and major manufacturers redirecting efforts towards more viable alternatives. The evolution of the aviation industry away from hydrogen reflects a broader trend towards practical and effective decarbonization solutions.
Read the full article here
