Summary
– Hertz customers were charged excessive fuel fees after renting Teslas and denied refunds
– One customer was billed $277.39 for gas he did not pump into the vehicle
– Another customer was billed $340.97 for the same fee and was unable to reach customer service for a refund
– Hertz acknowledged the error and blamed it on a computer system error
– Customers affected were refunded with a credit for a future EV rental.
Article
Customers of Hertz, one of the nation’s largest rental car companies, have been facing issues with gratuitous fuel fees when renting Teslas. Despite the fact that EVs do not require gas, customers have been charged fees for not returning the electric vehicles with a full tank. One customer was charged nearly $300 for a “Skip the Pump” fee, while another was charged over $300 for the same fee. In both cases, customers were initially denied refunds but eventually received their money back after complaints were made.
In addition to the fuel fees, customers have also reported being charged unnecessary fees for using Tesla’s Supercharger network. One customer prepaid for a week with a Tesla Model 3 and returned it without a full charge, resulting in an additional $690 in fees, including a $475 fuel charge and a $125 “rebill” charge for using the Supercharger network. These excessive fees have caused frustration among customers who feel they are being unfairly charged for services they did not use or were not informed about.
Reports of these unwarranted fees are not new, with Hertz being singled out on social media for charging customers for refueling fees when they should not have been. Hertz acknowledged the issue, attributing it to a systems error in their computer system. The rental giant has since fixed the problem that caused the inaccurate charges and has proactively reached out to affected customers to refund the erroneous charges. To compensate for the inconvenience, customers have been offered a credit toward a future EV rental.
This situation has raised questions about the transparency of rental car companies and their billing practices. Customers who rented Teslas from Hertz expected to have a seamless experience but instead faced unexpected charges that were not clearly outlined in the rental agreement. The lack of clarity around fees has left customers feeling frustrated and distrustful of the rental company, leading to complaints on social media and other outlets.
The controversy surrounding these fuel fees and additional charges has put Hertz in a negative light, causing customers to question whether they can trust the company to provide transparent and fair pricing. While Hertz has taken steps to correct the issue and compensate affected customers, the incident has shed light on the need for greater transparency and accountability in the rental car industry. Moving forward, customers will likely be more cautious when renting vehicles, especially EVs, to avoid falling victim to hidden fees and inaccurate charges.
Overall, the situation with Hertz and its excessive fuel fees for Tesla rentals highlights the importance of clear communication and transparent billing practices in the rental car industry. Customers deserve to know what fees they will be charged and why, especially when renting technologically advanced vehicles like electric cars. By addressing the issue and taking steps to prevent it from happening again, Hertz can rebuild trust with customers and ensure a more seamless rental experience in the future.
Read the full article here