Summary
- Carlos Ghosn, former head of Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance, criticizes proposed partnership between Honda, Nissan, and Mitsubishi
- Ghosn views the partnership as desperate due to lack of synergies between the companies
- Honda lacks clear vision for transition to electric cars, while Nissan faces challenges in the US and has cash problems
- Ghosn emphasizes the importance of being a global player in the auto industry to avoid being bought out by bigger companies
- US auto industry may isolate itself from the global market if certain brands are spun off, impacting access to technology for electric vehicles
Article
Carlos Ghosn, the former head of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance, shared his thoughts on the proposed new partnership between Honda, Nissan, and potentially Mitsubishi. Ghosn, who has a strained relationship with Nissan due to his past legal troubles with the company, described the collaboration as a desperate move driven by economic challenges faced by Nissan. He highlighted the difficulties in finding synergies between the two companies, suggesting that politics may be behind the deal rather than intrinsic value.
Ghosn emphasized the need for the Japanese auto industry to adapt to the transition towards electric vehicles and global competition. He noted that Honda lacks a clear vision for its electric car strategy and has faced challenges in partnership decisions, such as severing ties with General Motors. Ghosn also highlighted Honda’s engineering capabilities, particularly in Formula One, questioning the compatibility of their engineers with those from Nissan. He suggested that the collaboration may be more of a political move orchestrated by the Japanese government through METI.
Global auto industry trends were also discussed by Ghosn, who warned about the risks of remaining stagnant and the potential for weaker companies to be acquired by stronger ones. He speculated about the possibility of Foxconn acquiring Nissan and emphasized the importance of avoiding redundancies and focusing on core competencies. The conversation alluded to how national governments may support domestic auto manufacturers to counter Chinese competition, reflecting on past government interventions in the US auto industry.
The potential isolation of the US auto industry from the global market was raised, with mention of a US Senator’s agenda to advocate for spinning off certain brands currently held by Stellantis. This move could further separate American brands from international market trends and technology needed for the electric vehicle transition. The discussion highlighted the implications of such actions on the US economy and international trade relations, questioning the sustainability of an isolationist approach.
The article concluded with a reflection on the broader implications of national policies and industry decisions on the global auto market. It raised questions about the strategic direction of key players in the auto industry, including the US and Japanese companies mentioned. The discussion prompted readers to consider the long-term consequences of isolationist strategies and the importance of adapting to changing market dynamics, particularly in relation to electric vehicles and international competition.
Overall, Carlos Ghosn’s insights shed light on the complex interplay of politics, economics, and industry dynamics shaping the future of the auto industry. His pragmatic perspective underscored the challenges facing traditional automakers in a rapidly evolving market, emphasizing the need for adaptation, collaboration, and strategic foresight to navigate the transition towards electrification and global competition. This article serves as a thought-provoking analysis of key issues affecting the Japanese and US auto industries, offering a glimpse into the potential paths forward for industry players and policymakers alike.
Read the full article here
