Summary
- EU member states voted to allow the European Commission to increase tariffs on Chinese battery electric vehicles by up to 35.3 percent
- The US and EU approached the issue differently, with the US imposing harsher tariffs on Chinese products early on
- China tried to divide the EU on the issue, threatening trade retaliation targeting specific member states
- The EU tariffs may not fully block Chinese-made BEVs, allowing Beijing to establish a foothold in Europe
- The US must continue to work with allies to address challenges posed by China while recognizing their unique interests and divisions
Article
The European Union (EU) member states recently voted to allow the European Commission to increase tariffs on Chinese battery electric vehicles (BEVs) by up to 35.3 percent. This decision, expected to take effect by October 31, shows an alignment with the United States in tackling China’s economic practices. The differences in approach between Washington and Brussels stem from the United States’ preemptive measures due to limited exposure to Chinese BEV imports, making decisions easier compared to the EU, which has extensive exposure to China in this sector. The EU decision-making process was slower due to differing priorities among member states, with some pushing for stronger tariffs to address market distortions while others opposed due to overexposure to Chinese markets.
The European Commission’s investigation into unfair competition by China in the BEV sector led to member states voting on tariffs, exposing internal divisions within the EU. China sought to divide the EU ahead of the vote through leader-level outreach and negotiations with EU officials. Beijing threatened trade retaliation targeting specific EU member states in key export sectors, influencing some countries to change their positions. China also offered investment opportunities such as establishing BEV manufacturing plants in Europe, enticing some countries to vote against the tariffs. However, the European Commission left room for continued negotiations with China even after the tariffs were implemented.
The EU tariffs on Chinese BEVs represent a shift in the EU’s readiness to push back against Chinese pressure, but they may not fully block Chinese BEVs from entering the continent. Beijing’s efforts to scale BEV manufacturing in Europe could reduce the effectiveness of tariffs over time and entrench itself in European markets. The US and EU differ in their approach to BEVs, with security concerns driving the US tariffs while trade concerns underlie the EU’s decision. Both the US and EU will need to address potential national security risks associated with Chinese-made BEVs that could compromise data security and surveillance issues.
The United States and its allies must work together to address challenges posed by China’s economic practices while recognizing each country’s unique interests. The US should focus on uniting allies to address broader risks posed by BEVs in the EU while acknowledging the EU’s internal divisions. The EU tariffs may not be enough to deter Chinese BEVs from entering the market and establishing a foothold in Europe. Continued discussions on the security risks of connected vehicles, led by the US alongside the EU and other allies, are essential to address the growing presence of Chinese technology in the automotive sector.
Overall, the EU’s decision to impose tariffs on Chinese BEVs highlights the need for transatlantic coordination on economic practices with China. As China continues to expand its reach in the European automotive market, both the US and EU will need to work together to address national security risks associated with Chinese technology in connected vehicles. The focus must be on uniting allies and partners to effectively counter China’s economic influence while respecting each country’s unique interests and challenges in dealing with Beijing.
Read the full article here
