Summary
- Consider the realism of emergency preparedness versus copying Hollywood
- The US Army emphasizes on being able to shoot, move, communicate, survive, and sustain
- Different types of alternative vehicles may be necessary post-disaster, such as e-bikes or dirt bikes
- E-bikes do not require gas but have longer charging times compared to dirt bikes
- Personal needs, budget, durability, ease of use, and other factors should be considered in choosing between e-bikes and dirt bikes
Article
In today’s society, there seems to be a growing interest in emergency preparedness, fueled by fears of natural disasters, political unrest, or other potential threats. However, it’s important to question the realism of our preparedness efforts. While many individuals may have camping gear and weapons, they may lack basic supplies like a three-day emergency kit with food and water. Finding a balance between Hollywood-style preparedness and practicality is crucial in ensuring true readiness for any unforeseen events.
The U.S. Army emphasizes the importance of being able to “shoot, move, communicate, survive, and sustain,” highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach to preparedness. In the modern era, traditional methods of transportation and survival may not be sufficient, as evidenced by recent natural disasters that have caused major disruptions to infrastructure. Families and individuals must consider the practical aspects of their preparedness plans, including the need for access to essential supplies and resources.
In the aftermath of a series of devastating weather events in Western North Carolina, the question arises of what type of alternative vehicle would be best suited for navigating challenging environments post-disaster. A video on YouTube explores the comparison between traditional gas-powered dirt bikes and electric bikes (e-bikes) in terms of energy efficiency, fuel availability, durability, maintenance, and cost. Each type of vehicle has its own advantages and drawbacks, making it essential for individuals to evaluate their specific needs and circumstances.
E-bikes offer the advantage of not requiring gasoline for fuel, which can be scarce during emergencies, and can be easily recharged using portable solar panels. However, charging times and the limited range of e-bikes compared to gas-powered dirt bikes are important factors to consider. Durability, ease of use, budget, and weight also play a role in determining the suitability of each type of vehicle in emergency situations. While dirt bikes may be more affordable initially, e-bikes offer lower maintenance costs in the long run.
Controlling an e-bike during downhill descents, as well as considerations such as stealth and traction, are additional factors to take into account when choosing a vehicle for emergency preparedness. While both dirt bikes and e-bikes have their pros and cons, neither emerges as a clear winner in all situations. Individuals must carefully assess their needs and priorities to determine which type of vehicle would be most suitable for their emergency preparedness plans.
Ultimately, the decision between a gas-powered dirt bike and an e-bike for emergency transportation relies on a variety of factors, including individual circumstances, budget constraints, travel distances, and terrain challenges. While high-end e-bikes or electric dirt bikes may offer certain advantages, more affordable and lighter e-bike options may also be viable choices for those seeking a cost-effective and practical solution. It is essential for everyone to explore all available options and tailor their emergency preparedness plans to their specific needs and capabilities to ensure readiness for any potential crisis.
Read the full article here
