Summary
- Hydrogen is not abundant and must be extracted from compounds, requiring significant energy input
- Hydrogen is not cost-effective across multiple sectors compared to direct electrification
- Electrolysis for hydrogen production is not a clean and efficient process
- Hydrogen fuel cells are not highly efficient compared to other energy solutions
- Surplus renewable electricity does not make hydrogen production cheap and viable
Article
Hydrogen as an energy source has been a topic of debate, with proponents claiming it is abundant and readily available, practical and cost-effective in multiple sectors, and a clean and efficient energy carrier. However, research indicates that these claims may be misleading. Studies have shown that while hydrogen is abundant in the universe, it requires significant energy input and infrastructure to extract and produce. The high production costs and limited availability of green hydrogen make it less practical and cost-effective than direct electrification in most applications.
Another misleading claim is that electrolysis is a clean and efficient way to produce hydrogen for energy. Research has shown that electrolysis is energy-intensive and only as clean as the electricity source used, with efficiency losses making it less effective than direct electricity use in many applications. Additionally, hydrogen fuel cells are often touted as highly efficient compared to other energy solutions, but studies have shown that the overall system efficiency is only marginally better than internal combustion engines due to efficiency losses in hydrogen production, transport, and storage.
The idea that surplus renewable electricity makes hydrogen production cheap and viable may also be misleading. Studies have found that surplus renewable energy is often insufficient to sustain consistent hydrogen production, and high capital costs for electrolyzer utilization make the business case for surplus-powered hydrogen weak. Furthermore, claims that hydrogen burns clean with no emissions or environmental drawbacks have been refuted by research showing that hydrogen leakage can contribute to climate change by extending the lifetime of methane and increasing ozone levels.
Other misconceptions about hydrogen include its role in industry and the transportation sector. While hydrogen is widely used in industry, its energy use applications are limited by inefficiencies, high costs, and infrastructure challenges. In the transportation sector, studies have shown that battery electric vehicles are more energy-efficient and cost-effective than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, with hydrogen trains and planes facing technical and economic barriers compared to battery electric and electrified alternatives.
Furthermore, the claims about blue hydrogen being a low-carbon solution are disputed due to methane leakage and incomplete carbon capture, making it less environmentally friendly than initially thought. Additionally, the idea that hydrogen is necessary due to mineral shortages for batteries has been debunked by research showing that improved recycling methods and alternative battery chemistries mitigate material supply risks. Overall, the narrative that hydrogen is the cheapest way to decarbonize energy systems and easy to store for long periods is also challenged by studies showing that hydrogen storage and infrastructure development are complex, expensive, and inefficient compared to alternative energy storage solutions.
Read the full article here
