Summary
- Hydrogen for energy claims have been misleading and exaggerated for decades
- Hydrogen is not as readily available as claimed, must be extracted through energy-intensive processes
- Hydrogen as a fuel is unstable, costly, and hard to maintain, facing technical and economic challenges
- Electrolysis for energy-carrying hydrogen is inefficient and wasteful compared to direct electrification
- Hydrogen advocates often overlook significant challenges and environmental drawbacks of hydrogen as an energy source
Article
Hydrogen for energy has been discussed for decades, with extravagant claims being made about its potential. However, many of these claims are misleading and not entirely accurate. For example, while hydrogen is abundant, it is not readily available as an energy source as it must be extracted through energy-intensive processes. Additionally, using hydrogen as a fuel across multiple sectors may not be practical or cost-effective due to significant technical and economic challenges. Although hydrogen can be a fuel, it is often expensive and inefficient compared to other alternatives.
Claims that hydrogen can be produced cleanly through electrolysis are also overstated, as this process is not as efficient as using electricity directly in batteries or grid systems. The argument that hydrogen fuel cells are more efficient than internal combustion engines fails to consider the energy losses associated with producing, storing, and transporting hydrogen. It is important to consider the full energy chain when evaluating the efficiency of hydrogen as a fuel.
Furthermore, the idea that hydrogen can be produced cheaply during surplus periods of renewable electricity is misleading, as running electrolyzers only during surplus times may lead to poor utilization and high costs. Additionally, the claim that hydrogen combustion is clean overlooks the potential leakage of hydrogen and the production of nitrogen oxides, which are harmful air pollutants. While hydrogen may have potential in certain niche applications, it is important to consider its environmental impact and overall efficiency.
It is also important to debunk the false claim that hydrogen is a zero-emissions energy source, as the majority of hydrogen is currently produced from fossil fuels. Green hydrogen, produced through electrolysis powered by renewable energy, faces challenges in terms of high production costs and infrastructure requirements. Additionally, the claim that hydrogen is necessary due to mineral shortages for batteries overlooks the potential of recycling and alternative materials in battery production.
Overall, the hype surrounding hydrogen as an energy carrier should be approached with caution, as there are many misleading claims that do not fully consider the practical and economic challenges associated with hydrogen production, storage, and use. While hydrogen may have a role in specific applications, it is important to consider more efficient and cost-effective alternatives, such as direct electrification, biofuels, and battery technologies. By critically evaluating the claims surrounding hydrogen for energy, it is possible to make more informed decisions about the future of clean energy solutions.
Read the full article here
