Summary
- Hydrogen production through electrolysis is inefficient and costly compared to direct electrification
- Studies show that electrolysis for hydrogen incurs significant energy losses at every stage, making it less efficient than direct electrification solutions
- Battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) are more efficient than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCEVs) when accounting for electrolysis, compression, storage, transport, and fuel cell conversion
- Heat pumps are a more efficient alternative to hydrogen for space and water heating applications, delivering 3-5 times more energy than they consume
- Electrolysis is financially prohibitive and requires vast amounts of renewable energy capacity, making it an impractical option for decarbonization in most sectors
Article
Hydrogen is often seen as a clean energy carrier, with electrolysis being touted as a viable method for its production. However, studies show that electrolysis incurs significant energy losses, making it inefficient compared to direct electrification. The process requires approximately 50-60 kWh of electricity per kilogram of hydrogen, with only about 33 kWh of usable energy delivered, resulting in a loss of 40-50% of the energy in the conversion process. This inefficiency is further highlighted when comparing the overall efficiency of battery-electric vehicles to hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.
In addition to energy inefficiency, electrolysis for hydrogen production is financially prohibitive. The high capital and operational expenses make it unlikely to compete with battery storage or direct grid consumption of renewables. Furthermore, relying on electrolysis for large-scale hydrogen production would require vast amounts of renewable energy capacity. The costs associated with distribution, storage, and conversion of hydrogen further compound its inefficiencies, making it a significantly more expensive energy vector than initially anticipated.
While hydrogen has a role in decarbonizing industrial processes, its broader use as a general energy carrier is problematic. Direct electrification is often a more cost-effective and emission-free solution compared to using hydrogen produced through electrolysis. Green hydrogen may have a place in industrial feedstock applications that lack viable alternatives, but attempting to expand its role beyond necessary niches risks wasting renewable energy resources and making the energy transition more difficult and expensive.
A detailed analysis by David Cebon illustrates the inefficiency of hydrogen compared to heat pumps for space and water heating applications. Heat pumps can deliver 3-5 times the energy they consume, making them a far superior option to hydrogen for these purposes. Moreover, the financial challenges associated with hydrogen production have been highlighted by real-world deals and projections from organizations like Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
In essence, prioritizing direct electrification where possible and strategically deploying green hydrogen for specific industrial applications is crucial in achieving a decarbonized future. The enthusiasm surrounding electrolysis for hydrogen production needs to be tempered with an understanding of its inefficiencies and costs. By focusing on practical and cost-effective solutions, such as direct electrification and targeted use of green hydrogen, the energy transition can be accelerated without unnecessary waste of resources.
Read the full article here
