Summary
– Governor Jay Inslee made bizarre claims about EV school buses, stating they silence children and mature them
– He was promoting state rebates of up to $9,000 for purchasing or leasing EVs, despite acknowledging low demand
– Inslee believes that offering rebates will democratize EV purchasing, although it does not
– He claimed that EV school buses transform kids by making them quieter and more mature
– The validity of Inslee’s claims and enthusiasm for EVs are questioned, suggesting he may have a vested interest in promoting the technology
Article
During a press conference promoting electric vehicles (EVs), Governor Jay Inslee of Washington made some strange claims about the benefits of EV school buses. He suggested that EV school buses quiet down “rambunctious” children and help them mature. Inslee was also promoting new state rebates of up to $9,000 for qualifying Washingtonians to purchase or lease EVs, despite the lack of demand for these vehicles. He failed to see the contradiction in trying to bribe people to buy EVs while claiming there is a high demand for them. Additionally, Inslee’s belief that offering rebates will “democratize” EV purchasing is flawed, as the infrastructure to support long commutes or trips is lacking.
Inslee’s comments about the supposed universal love for EV school buses were met with confusion, as it is unclear why the drivers and children would prefer them. He claimed that drivers appreciate EV school buses because the kids are quieter and more mature, as they no longer have to breathe in diesel smoke. However, the idea that EV technology can mature children or make them quieter seems far-fetched. Inslee’s exaggerated claims about the benefits of EVs, including their ability to cure baldness and have anti-aging properties, further highlight the disconnect between his perception and reality.
The skepticism surrounding Inslee’s promotion of EV technology is evident in the lack of enthusiasm for these vehicles. The idea that EV school buses can magically transform children and solve behavioral issues is met with doubt, as the technology itself has limitations. Inslee’s assertion that EVs are superior in every way, from reducing noise pollution to improving driver satisfaction, is not supported by concrete evidence. The exaggerated claims only serve to undermine the credibility of EVs and make it harder for consumers to take them seriously as a viable transportation option.
Despite Inslee’s efforts to sell EVs through rebates and exaggerated claims, the reality is that the infrastructure to support widespread adoption of these vehicles is lacking. The inability of EVs to support long commutes or trips to rural areas, combined with the high cost of purchasing and maintaining them, makes them less appealing to the average consumer. The disconnect between Inslee’s perception of EVs as a panacea and the practical limitations they face in real-world scenarios highlights the need for a more balanced and informed discussion about the future of transportation.
In conclusion, Governor Jay Inslee’s unconventional claims about the benefits of EV school buses and electric vehicles in general highlight the disconnect between perception and reality. While he may believe in the transformative power of EV technology, the practical limitations and lack of infrastructure to support widespread adoption make his claims seem exaggerated and unrealistic. The need for a more balanced and informed discussion about the future of transportation, including the role of EVs, is essential to address the challenges and opportunities in transitioning to more sustainable modes of transportation. Inslee’s enthusiasm for EVs may be well-intentioned, but without a realistic assessment of their limitations, his efforts to promote them may not be as effective as he hopes.
Read the full article here
