Summary
- Attorney General Mike Hilgers filed a lawsuit against a White House rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- The lawsuit aims to stop the electric vehicle mandate on truck manufacturers
- The rule would increase the percentage of battery-powered heavy-duty trucks sold from 0.10% to 45%
- The attorneys general argue that the EPA’s rule should be left for Congress to decide, not for unaccountable bureaucrats in Washington
- Nebraska led a 24-state coalition against the rule, which includes Iowa and Missouri.
Article
Attorney General Mike Hilgers has taken a stand against a White House rule mandating electric vehicles for truck manufacturers by filing a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The rule, issued by the federal Environmental Protection Agency earlier this year, requires manufacturers to produce more electric trucks and fewer internal-combustion trucks. The goal is to increase the percentage of battery-powered heavy-duty trucks sold from 0.10% to 45%. Hilgers and other attorneys general argue that this rule bypasses the proper policy-making process that should be determined by Congress, not bureaucratic agencies like the EPA. They believe that decisions as consequential as mandating electric trucks should be made by Congress and the states, not federal agencies.
The attorneys general are concerned that the EPA’s rule will have negative impacts on the trucking industry and supply chain infrastructure beyond the agency’s authority. They believe that this push for electric trucks is part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s climate agenda, which they see as harmful to Americans. By challenging the rule in court, Hilgers and the 24-state coalition, including Iowa and Missouri, are making a common-sense argument for upholding the rule of law and ensuring that major decisions such as requiring manufacturers to sell electric trucks are made through the appropriate legislative channels rather than through executive orders from Washington.
The lawsuit filed by Attorney General Hilgers is part of a larger effort by a coalition of states to push back against what they see as overreach by federal agencies in implementing sweeping policy changes without proper congressional approval. By taking this legal action, the states are asserting their rights to have a say in decisions that will impact industries and economies within their borders. The lawsuit is not just a challenge to a specific rule, but a broader defense of the separation of powers and the principles of federalism that dictate how policy decisions should be made at different levels of government.
As Nebraska leads the charge against the electric vehicle mandate, other states are joining forces to challenge the rule and ensure that the proper legislative process is followed. This lawsuit is an example of states stepping up to protect their interests and defend their authority in the face of federal overreach. Through this legal action, Attorney General Hilgers and the coalition of states are making a strong statement about the importance of following constitutional processes and upholding the balance of power between the federal government and the states. By challenging the EPA’s rule on electric trucks, they are also questioning the broader implications of unchecked executive authority and advocating for greater transparency and accountability in the decision-making process.
The coalition of states, including Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, have come together to challenge the electric vehicle mandate in a united front against what they see as an infringement on their rights and a violation of the rule of law. By working together to challenge the EPA’s rule, these states are sending a clear message that they will not stand idly by as federal agencies attempt to impose sweeping changes without proper oversight and input from Congress. This lawsuit is just one example of states exercising their authority and pushing back against executive overreach in order to protect their interests and ensure that policy decisions are made in a lawful and transparent manner.
In filing the lawsuit against the White House rule mandating electric vehicles for truck manufacturers, Attorney General Mike Hilgers and the coalition of states are not only challenging a specific policy but are also defending the principles of federalism and the separation of powers. By arguing that decisions of this magnitude should be made through the proper legislative channels, they are asserting the importance of congressional oversight and input in shaping major policies that will impact industries and economies. Through this legal action, the states are standing up for their rights and making a strong statement about the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that government actions are carried out in a transparent and accountable manner.
Read the full article here