Summary
– Glass Lewis recommends voting against Elon Musk’s $56 billion compensation plan for Tesla due to its excessive size and potential dilutive effect on shareholders
– The compensation plan was struck down by a Delaware judge in January but is up for ratification again, causing division among shareholders
– Tesla’s board has recommended voting in favor of ratifying Musk’s pay package and re-incorporating the company in Texas at the upcoming shareholders meeting on June 13
– The company has been urging shareholders to vote yes on the proposals through various ads and a dedicated website, while Tesla’s largest individual shareholder opposes the compensation plan
– Musk has threatened to develop AI and robotics outside of Tesla if he does not receive enough voting control within the company
Article
Proxy advisory firm Glass Lewis has recommended voting against Elon Musk’s $56 billion compensation plan due to its excessive size and potential dilutive effect on shareholders. The firm also expressed concerns about Musk’s involvement in projects unrelated to Tesla, which could impact the company’s operations. This recommendation comes as shareholders are deciding how to vote on the proposal, which was previously approved by investors in 2018 but struck down by a Delaware judge in January.
Following the voiding of the compensation plan, Tesla has launched a new vote to ratify the previously approved package, leading to divided opinions among shareholders. The annual shareholders meeting is set to take place on June 13, with the company’s board recommending voting in favor of ratifying Musk’s pay package and moving to re-incorporate the automaker in Texas. Despite the company’s efforts to encourage shareholders to vote yes on the proposals, there has been substantial discussion and opposition to the compensation plan.
Tesla’s largest individual shareholder has publicly voiced opposition to the proposals and recommended that other investors vote against the compensation plan. There have been discussions regarding whether to vote in favor of or against the package, with Musk also threatening to develop AI and robotics outside of Tesla if he does not have enough voting control within the company. The company has been actively promoting the proposals through ads and a dedicated website, urging investors to vote in favor of the two proposals.
The ongoing vote to ratify Elon Musk’s compensation plan has garnered attention from shareholders and advisory firms like Glass Lewis, who have raised concerns about its size and potential impact on shareholders. With the annual shareholders meeting approaching, stakeholders are faced with the decision of voting in favor or against the proposals presented by Tesla. The company’s efforts to secure approval for the compensation plan have been met with opposition from some shareholders, including Tesla’s largest individual shareholder, adding to the debate surrounding the issue.
Despite the challenges and criticisms faced by Tesla in relation to Elon Musk’s compensation plan, the company remains focused on promoting the proposals and securing shareholder approval. The re-incorporation of the automaker in Texas and the ratification of Musk’s pay package are key agenda items for the upcoming shareholders meeting. The outcome of the vote and the implications for Tesla’s future operations remain uncertain, as stakeholders continue to weigh the potential risks and benefits of the proposed compensation plan.
Overall, the vote on Elon Musk’s 2018 compensation plan is a significant decision for Tesla and its shareholders, with implications for the company’s financial stability and corporate governance. The recommendations and concerns raised by advisory firm Glass Lewis reflect the broader discussions and debates surrounding the proposal. As shareholders prepare to cast their votes at the upcoming meeting, the future of Tesla and Elon Musk’s compensation plan will be closely watched by investors and industry observers.
Read the full article here
