Summary
- Delaware High Court warns judge in Elon Musk pay package case of potential risk with massive legal fee windfall
- Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick rules Musk’s $56 billion pay package as not in the best interest of shareholders
- Musk’s attorneys set to make potential pay rate of $280,000 an hour
- Attorneys request 11% fee of 29 million Tesla shares or $1 billion in cash after winning case
- Shareholders overwhelmingly approve rectified pay package for Musk, putting judge in tough position
Article
The judge in the Elon Musk pay package case is facing criticism from the Delaware High Court for potentially awarding massive legal fees to the attorneys who successfully had the pay package revoked. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick ruled that Musk’s $56 billion pay package was excessive and not in the best interest of shareholders. The attorneys involved in the case are now set to receive a potential pay rate of $280,000 an hour, which is unprecedented and raises concerns about excessive fees.
Some legal experts believe that while high-risk cases deserve high rewards for successful outcomes, there is a point where fees become excessive and unnecessary. The firms representing Musk requested an 11 percent fee of the stock Musk would have received if he won the case, amounting to nearly $6 billion in Tesla shares. They also suggested taking $1 billion in cash instead, arguing that they deserve it for winning what they consider to be one of the largest judgments in U.S. history.
In comparison to other high-profile cases, the requested fee of $280,000 an hour far exceeds the typical rates for corporate attorneys, which are around $2,500 an hour. A previous case in 2012 resulted in a fee of $304 million for a $2 billion judgment, which worked out to about $35,000 an hour. The judge’s decision on how to handle the legal fees in this case will have significant implications for both Musk and Tesla.
Following the ruling by Chancellor McCormick, shareholders of Tesla voted in favor of Musk’s pay package in a subsequent vote. This raises questions about whether the shareholder vote should take precedence over the judge’s ruling, as it reflects the will of the company’s owners and investors. Tesla attorney Paul Reed argues that the company should not be held responsible for large legal fees if the shareholders have approved the pay package, leading to a complex legal situation for the Chancellor to navigate.
The ongoing controversy surrounding the legal fees in the Musk pay package case highlights the complexities and risks involved in high-stakes litigation. The unprecedented amount requested by the attorneys, as well as the conflicting interests between shareholders and legal stakeholders, create a challenging situation for all parties involved. The final decision on how to resolve the legal fee issue will have lasting effects on the case and may set a precedent for future high-profile legal battles.
Read the full article here
